It is clear that I have problems with authority figures: doctors, policemen, lawyers, teachers, the pope, David Cameron, the woman on Listen with Mother who wanted you to sit comfortably.
My immediate reaction is either to say a flat out: ‘No!’ (and I wonder where Tallulah gets it from), or ‘Why?’
It’s not always that I really don’t want to do whatever is being asked of me, but I do hate being herded down a road I might not want to go down, and at least saying no buys you a few minutes to think about whether you actually want to do what is being suggested or not.
I am not a total anarchist. Far from it. As I was discussing with May earlier. I am an anarchist with liberal leanings. I think you should do what you want as long as you retain some kind of moral code, take responsibility for what you are doing, and try not to hurt other people.
I also, as discussed in an earlier blog post in the week, think you should try to be a polite anarchist if you’re going to be one. Saying excuse me before you punch someone in the face, and then offering them a hankie to soak up the blood. That sort of thing.
I have sympathy with all types of protesters, even if I don’t agree with what they are protesting about. I have an innate respect for anyone who doesn’t just lie down and take it, or who questions the status quo. (That Francis Rossi. He’s always laying down the law. Bastard).
I hate thoughtless obedience to the letter of the law as much as thoughtless disobedience.
It is a good job I am a pacifist because if I weren’t I would have been court martialled in the first week of joining the army for my continual questioning of orders and my inability to do anything without wanting a damn good reason for it.
It is this inability to blindly follow instructions that drives my children crazy, as the most interaction I have with authority other than my own, is with schools and other organisations the children belong to. They dread coming home with any message for me. They invariably get the third degree, and I usually refuse to do anything they tell me the school, or brownies, or choir say they have to, unless there is written evidence.
Even then it is not a given that I will do as required. I am an inveterate letter writer. The children hate it when I write letters. Their hearts sink.
Disgusted of Broughton Astley etc.
I know that as they grow, my behaviour will push them in one of two ways. Either they will embrace their own anarchist leanings (as I did under my mother and maternal grandmother’s excellent tuition), or they will join the army, vote conservative and have life sized posters of Margaret Thatcher in every room.
Such is life.
My latest concern/question/musing is with regard to school dinners. It doesn’t affect me enough to make me want to go on a crusade (yet), but it is puzzling me.
My children have hot dinners at their primary school. The school works hard within some ridiculously restrictive government guidelines to provide balanced meals under the circumstances. The money allocated for such meals is pitifully little and the whole thing is largely controlled by County Hall. Their hands are, for the most part, tied.
A friend of mine lives in a fairly affluent area where the parents are for the large part health conscious and well educated about nutrition. They have banded together to subsidise their school to provide a working school kitchen with real cooks who cook real food. I am amazed and impressed.
I doubt that it would happen in our school. I truly do.
Most school kitchens these days are just places where the meals get delivered and the dinner ladies heat up the food that is provided from big, refrigerated lorries. I think this must be a fairly soul destroying and frustrating job. I am sure they would prefer to cook from scratch. I know I would.
I have a lot of sympathy with Jamie Oliver and his school meals campaign. The health service and politicians rage about the problem of obesity in this country but the fact remains that the nutritional value of the food served in most schools is extremely poor, and processed food is still standard.
Children are not taught to cook anything properly. Cookery classes are a futile exercise in arranging fruit salads so that the schools can tick a box to say that the child has done cooking, but there are thousands of children who don’t know one end of an aubergine from the other and think of cooking as an exercise in warming up things from the freezer section of the supermarket.
Vegetables which have been pre cooked, pre frozen and pre prepared are still very much the norm in most schools and add this to the fact that whatever smidgeon of nutritional value is left in those vegetables is destroyed in the cooking and re-heating process, the children might as well eat mush.
The schools my children have been to take great pride in the fact that they only serve chips once a week as a treat for the children. No mention is made of the fact that potato wedges are generally served every day.
In Tallulah’s last school they made a great deal of the fact that they didn’t allow the children butter on their jacket potatoes. Like this was going to save them all from imminent death from obesity. The fact that the jackets are generally microwaved, and jackets are absolutely disgusting if you don’t have something to take the dryness away is by the by.
Which is the other thing I do not understand. If you don’t want children to be obese, teach them to cook properly and teach them about nutrition. If you want them to eat healthily you need to make the food taste nice. Even I would take a turkey twizzler over a dry, nuked jacket potato any day of the week.
And you cannot tell me that the meat that is provided for the children is anything other than the absolute dregs. I only buy organic meat, and I know how expensive it is. School meals cost £1.95 per day for the entire meal. There is no way they are buying anything other than intensively reared animals pumped full of chemicals. I’m sure they would love to provide healthier meat, but the economics are against them.
You may wonder why I continue to make my children eat the meals the schools provide, knowing what I do.
It is selfishness on my part. It is not about making packed lunches, because it’s the work of five minutes every morning at most.
It is because my children have such a finicky attitude to food. I want them to appreciate what we have at home and how different it tastes from what they get at school. I also use it as a weapon in my arsenal in a different way. Quite often they beg me to allow them to have sandwiches every day instead of hot dinners.
I have said that they can have sandwiches at school every day when they start eating everything on their plates at dinner time at home and prove to me that they can eat healthily. Until such time they are to keep having hot dinners.
Mean, I know, but when the argument comes up it guarantees me at least a week of good plate clearing action before they forget and go back to being their usual challenging selves at the dinner table.
I have ranted about this kind of thing before. The reason it is in my mind this week is that on two days this week my children had to be provided with packed lunches because they were going to the pantomime and wouldn’t be back at lunch time.
On the day Oscar went I gave him cheese sandwiches, a packet of crisps, a satsuma, some apple juice and three Maoam chews.
Maoams, for those of you who do not have your finger on the pulse of the sweet world, are small fruit chews that taste a bit like petrol with strawberry essence. My children love them. I do not understand why, but that is because I am forty and not hip.
Proven conclusively by the fact that I used the word hip.
When I went to pick him up, one of the classroom assistants, who by the way is absolutely darling, and who puts up with me and Oscar with the patience of a saint, handed me the Maoams I had given him and said: ‘I’m sorry, but we don’t allow the children to have sweets in their packed lunches, so he will have to eat them now that the bell has rung.’
I thanked her for explaining it to me, and gave Oscar his chews to eat while we were waiting for Tallulah to come out.
On the way home I suddenly had a thought. Every lunch time the hot dinners children have pudding. They have biscuits, and pies, and custard and cakes. Every single lunch time.
So why can’t children have sweets in their packed lunches?
I am already in enough trouble at the moment, and as my children eat hot dinners anyway it really doesn’t matter, except that it does, because it niggles me, and it doesn’t make sense at all. What is the difference between three, small fruit chews and a doughnut, for example? The doughnut is almost certainly more calorific, and as well as sugar will be dripping with saturated fat.
I asked my mum when I went to her house the next morning before school.
Apparently the children who take packed lunches can take doughnuts, or biscuits, or fruit pies.
They just aren’t allowed sweets.
This makes even less sense to me.
Truly, my head was in a spin.
What is the difference? What?
My mum said it was because the school found that some parents were just sending their children to school with bags of sweets as their packed lunch (see my previous statement as to the hopelessness of getting parents to pay for proper meals?)
Which is fair enough, except that cakes and biscuits are just as bad for you, and in some cases worse. Do these clearly nutritionally challenged parents not just swap bags of sweets for cakes?
Maybe they don’t. Which raises a whole load of questions in itself.
I understand the rules about not letting the children have nuts in school. So many children these days have nut allergies, and children are a nightmare for tasting each other’s food or swapping outright. You really do not want to be jabbing stray ten year olds with epi pens every five minutes.
But this just seems bonkers.
Mum suggested I join the PTFA. I looked at her like she was insane. I would be drummed out quicker than you could say ‘annoying bloody parent.’ I would be the poster child for universal hatred in the school. Still, I suppose it might bring the parents and teachers together in blissful harmony.
I don’t think my blood pressure could stand it.